Sefali Mondal @ Shefali Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

06.05.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 2079 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Murutia Police Station Case No. 68 of 2022 dated 08.04.2022 under Sections 467/468/420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In Re : Sefali Mondal ...... petitioner Ms. Minoti Gomes ....for the petitioner Mr. Binoy Panda Mr. Subham Bhakat ....for the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that, the record of rights in respect of an immovable property was tampered with by the petitioner.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that the allegations are of tampering of record of rights, which is maintained by the government department, it would be appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Kausik Chanda, J.)