Rakesh Kumar Chaudhury v. Lafarge Aggregates & Concrete India Pvt Ltd

11-03-2022 Subha Item no. 25 Ct no.34

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction C.R.R 1052 of 2017 In the matter of : Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary .....petitioner.

In Re : An application under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Mr. Amartya Ghose Mrs. Rituparna De Ghose, Ms. Rimpa Rajpal ....for the petitioner.

Mr. Ghose, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits written instruction received from the petitioner. Let the written instruction submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner be kept with the record.

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits, according to the written instruction, he does not want to proceed with the revisional application.

Accordingly, the application being CRR 1052 of 2017 is dismissed as not pressed.

All pending applications, if any, in connection with the revisional application, are consequently disposed of.

Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.

All concerned parties are to act in terms of a copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. [Tirthankar Ghosh, J]