Mushida Molla And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

13.04.2023.

41.

Ct.No.28 as (Rejected) C.R.M. (DB) 1463 of 2023 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Haringhata P. S. Case No.76 of 2022 dated 23.03.2022 under Sections 498A/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Mushida Molla & Anr.

... Petitioners.

Mr. Sumanta Das.

...for the Petitioners.

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherji, ld. P.P., Mr. Partha Pratim Das, Ms. Eshita Dutta.

...for the State.

Petitioners renew their bail prayer.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the bail prayer. We have considered the materials on record. Bail prayer of the petitioners was rejected earlier on merits. Date has been fixed for recording prosecution evidence.

Under such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected.

Trial court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same at an early date without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)