Calcutta High CourtCPAN/974/2000dismissed for default

Anita Pramanik v. Rakesh Kr. Batsa

2022-07-26Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

26.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 974 of 2000 Anita Pramanik Vs. Rakesh Kr. Batsa In WPA 14390 of 1999 Anita Pramanik Vs.

The State ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)