Parvina Mondal @ Parvina Khatun Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

28.04.2025 Court No.28 Item No.47 ssi CRM (A) 1336 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Bagdah P.S. Case No.585 of dated 18.06.2024 under Sections 341/325/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Parvina Mondal @ Parvina Khatun Mondal ....Applicant/Petitioner.

Md. Abdur Rakib Mr. Somnath Majumder Mr. Mojahid Mehedi ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee Mr. Abhishek Verma ...for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner is the wife of the principal accused. There was a delay of four days in lodging an FIR. No grievous injury was suffered by anyone.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits as follows. Statements of witnesses and injury report clearly make out a prima facie case. However, it does not appear that any grievous injury was inflicted.

In view of the materials available in the case diary and the alleged role ascribed to the present petitioner, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case. In view thereof, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall not try to influence the witnesses or threaten them and the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Jay Sengupta, J.)