Narayan Chandra Roy v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

Item No.8 In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side 16.06.2023 Ct-24 WPA 8818 of 2023 Narayan Chandra Roy v.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Serjati Sengupta Mr. R. Guha Thakurta Ms. Dipa Roy Ms. Don Ghosh ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajib Mukherjee Ms. Shreyasi Bhaduri ... for the Municipality.

Mr. Tapas Kumar Mandal ... for the State.

The petitioner prays for disbursal of the gratuity amount as mentioned in the Pension Payment Order issued on 23rd December, 2022. The dues of the petitioner on account of unpaid gratuity amount is Rs. 5,86,431/-. The employee in question was in service with the Bhatpara Municipality.

Learned advocate representing the Municipality submits, upon instruction that, on account of paucity of fund, the payment could not be made. It has been submitted that huge sum of money to the Municipality is due and payable by the State.

Submission of the Municipality is that till the dues of the Municipality is cleared by the State, the dues of the employees cannot be disbursed.

Learned advocate for the State respondents does not have any instruction in the matter.

Non-availability or paucity of funds can never be the ground for not disbursing the gratuity amount mentioned in the PPO.

In the instant case PPO was issued long back and till date the petitioner has not been paid the dues. Such stand of the respondents cannot be accepted under any circumstances.

The authority is duty bound to disburse the dues of the petitioner along with interest.

The respondents are directed to immediately take steps for clearing the dues of the petitioner at the earliest but positively by 31st August, 2023 along with interest at the rate of 7% per annum payable on and from the due date till the date of actual payment. In the event the principal along with the interest is not disbursed within the aforesaid time limit, then the petitioner shall be entitled to receive the principal amount along with additional 3% interest, that is, 7%+3%= 10% interest payable on and from the due date till the date of actual payment.

It is made clear that the rate of interest is fixed keeping in mind the submission of the learned advocate representing the Municipality that there is acute shortage of funds. The statutory interest submitted by the petitioner, that is, 10% is accordingly not being granted at the initial stage, but if the payment is not made within the stipulated time, then on account of

additional interest the respondents will be liable to pay interest at the rate of 10% as mentioned above. It will be open for the Municipality to seek financial assistance from the State respondents in the event the Municipality is not in a position to clear the entire dues of the petitioner.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

Sh (Amrita Sinha, J.)