← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1578/2023dismissed as rejected

Sadhan Chandra v. State Of West Bengal

2023-04-24Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay2 pages

24.04.2023 Serial no. 01 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) (Rejected) CRM (A) 1578 of 2023 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Jhalda Police Station Case No. 49 of 2023 dated 19.03.2023 under Sections 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; corresponding to G.R. case no. 480 of 2023.

-AndIn the matter of : Sadhan Chandra ... ...Petitioner Mr. Soumik Ganguly, Mr. Dilip Kr. Sadhu, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan, Mr. Chittaranjan Ghosh, Advocates ... ...For the State Report as called for by the order dated April 17, 2023 filed in Court be taken on record.

Report speaks of call details recording between the petitioner and the person arrested with the commercial quantity of narcotics.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner refers to an order passed by the Sessions Court in respect of the coaccused. It appears from such order, the police case was then registered under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Provisions of the NDPS Act, 1985 were subsequently added.

Prima facie it appears that the materials seized are narcotics of commercial quantity.

Police apparently are in a position to demonstrate the nexus between the petitioner and the person arrested with the

commercial quantity of narcotics through the call details recording.

In such circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner is unable to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

Consequently, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 1578 of 2023 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)