Anindya Sekhar Purkayastha v. Tapasi Choudhury Purkayastha

08.12.2020 (S/L-57) Ct.-18 (Susanta) C.O. 655 of 2014 Anindya Sekhar Purkayastha -Vs- Tapasi Choudhuri Purkayastha Mr. Devajyoti Barman, ..... For the petitioner.

Mr. Devajyoti Barman, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the revisional application has become infructuous and as such, his client does not want to press the same.

C.O 655 of 2014 is dismissed as not pressed.

(Biswajit Basu, J.)