Debnath Chatterjee v. Arindam Chatterjee

AG M/R 08.06.

C.O. 1218 of 2022 KB Ct Sri Debnath Chatterjee Vs Sri Arindam Chatterjee Mr. Siddheswar Chandra, Mr. Sandip Dutta, ... For the petitioner.

A direction to secure expeditious disposal of an application under Order 7 Rule 10A of the Code of Civil Procedure together with another application under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is the ultimate relief sought for in this case. Admittedly, petitioner/defendant has been suffering ad interim order of injunction.

The only contention expressed by the learned advocate for the petitioner is against the delay caused in the disposal of interlocutory applications referred hereinabove.

No other point is raised requiring address by this Court.

In view of the nature of the order proposed to be made in this case, no prior notice is considered to be necessary upon the opposite party.

Service of notice of this application upon opposite party stands dispensed with.

Accordingly, learned 13th Judge, City Civil Court, Calcutta in Title Suit No. 1194 of 2021 is requested to ensure expeditious disposal of

interlocutory applications referred hereinabove one after another, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to this case, subject to the convenience and suitability of the Court, but without granting unnecessary adjournments, unless it is extremely unavoidable.

Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the learned advocate appearing in the court below for the opposite party and the opposite party.

With this observation and direction, the revisional application stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings.

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J)