Sk. Tahidul Islam @ Sk. Pintu v. State Of West Bengal

04.10.2021 Serial no. 63 Aloke Ct. No. 29 (Through Video Conference) CRM 3523 of 2021 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 21.04.2021 in connection with Shyampore Police Station Case No. 51 of 2021 dated 02.03.2021 under Sections 417/376 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of: Sk. Tahidul Islam @ Sk. Pintu ... Petitioner Ms. Juin Dutta Chakraborty, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. N.P. Agarwal, Advocate Ms. Subhasree Patel, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated. The police case arose out of a love affairs going sour.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and to the medical reports. Considering the statements recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the victim lady and considering the medical report, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer once in month till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date. The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM 3523 of 2021 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)