Calcutta High CourtCPAN/890/2003dismissed for default

Manjusha Kandoi v. Kamal Kr. Parta

2022-09-29Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

29-09-2022 Item no.15 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.890 of 2003 Smt. Manjusha Kandoi -vsShri Kamal Kumar Patra arising out of WPA No.16578 of 2002 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on June 10, 2003, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated April 10, 2003 passed by this court in WP No.16578(W) of 2002.

It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]