Namita Hazra (Hatui) v. State Of West Bengal & ORS
12.11.2025.
PB Sl. No.19.
Ct. No.23.
In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 6932 of 2010 Dr. Namita Hazra (Hatui) Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
1.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for.
2.
Even on earlier occasion, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3.
This case pertains to the year 2010.
4.
Despite direction, no affidavit-in-opposition and affidavit-in-reply have yet been filed as per the report of the Registry and despite direction passed by the Coordinate Bench on 13th April, 2010. 5.
The writ petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking order/direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to give effect and/or further effect to the impugned notice being Annexure P-8 in respect of Thupsara Gram Panchayat and to show-cause as to why a notification as aforesaid should not be rescinded/withdrawn and/or quashed and also restraining the respondents from disturbing
the service condition of the petitioner as Homeopathic Medical Officer at Thupsara Gram Panchayat till the disposal of the application.
6.
By the said notification, the respondent authority issued notification for engagement of part time Ayush Doctors in the Gram Panchayat level dispensaries on contractual arrangement under NRHM.
7.
This case is pending since 2010. Almost 15 years have been passed.
8.
Considering the nature of prayer and long pendency of this writ petition, it seems to this Court that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case anymore either on the ground that the purpose of filing this writ petition has been resolved or that he has abandoned his prayer due to passage of time. 9.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Connected applications, if any, are also, thus, disposed of.
10.
The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
11.
All parties are to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)