Anjali Maiti & ORS v. Asimay Maiti & ORS

18.12.2023 13.

Asr CO 1446 of 2011 Anjali Maiti & Ors.

Versus

Asimay Maiti & Ors.

Petitioners are not represented.

There is no representation on behalf of the opposite parties.

It appears that the instant revisional application is preferred challenging the impugned order dated 7th April, 2011 whereby application for comparison of LTI and signature of one Subhasini Maiti was rejected by the learned Trial Court.

Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned order the present revisional application is preferred. It appears that the instant revisional application is pending since the year 2011 and there is reasonable ground to believe that the petitioners have lost their interest to proceed with the present application. So, there is no option left but to dismiss the present application. Accordingly, the revisional application being CO/1446/2011 is dismissed for default.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

There will be no order as to costs.

(Prasenjit Biswas,J.)