Jatin Pramanik & ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

Ct rup 26.09.

CRR 1226 of 2016 IA NO: CRAN 1 of 2023 Sri Jatin Pramanik & Anr.

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Amarendra Nath Ray. ... for the petitioner. Mr. N. C. Dey, ... for the O.P 2. Mr. Pratick Bose ... for the State. In Re: CRAN 1 of 2023

1. Both the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the parties are present.

2. By the judgment and order of conviction dated 9th December, 2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Bongaon, North 24 Parganas in connection with G.R.

No.66 of 2001, learned Magistrate found all petitioners/appellants guilty of committing offence under Section 341/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and petitioners were sentenced to suffer fifteen (15) days and also to fine of Rs.250 each, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for five (05) days each for the offence punishable under Section 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced the petitioners to suffer simple imprisonment for term of five (05) months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default, to suffer further simple imprisonment for one

(01) month each for the offence punishable under Section 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Being aggrieved the appeal was preferred before the Additional Session Judge, 1st Class, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas in connection with Criminal Appeal No.02 of 2014 wherein learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Bongaon affirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bongoan.

4. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said order in appeal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, the instant criminal revisional was preferred wherein a compromise application being CRAN 1 of 2023 has been filed by the parties to this criminal revision.

5. Both the learned advocates have submitted that the compromise in relation to the disputes by and between the parties of this case gave rise to the compromise petition and prays for disposing of the instant criminal revision.

6. Both the offences under Section 341/323 are compoundable within the provision of Section 320 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as term of imprisonment, I do not find any reason to disallow the prayer for compromise.

8. Both the petitioners/appellants are being acquitted

and discharged from their respective bail bond.

9. Accordingly, CRAN 1 of 2023 stands disposed of. 10.

As a sequel Criminal Revision No. 1226 of 2016 also stands disposed of.

11.

LCR be returned.

12.

All parties to this revisional application shall act on the server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)