Nikhil Ranjan Kar v. Pankaj Tamang Special Land Acquisition Officer Coochbehar

24.11.2023 PB Sl. No.5.

WPCRC 191 of 2023 in WPA 29178 of 2017 Nikhil Ranjan Kar Vs Pankaj Tamang Mr. Samim Ahmed, Ms. Ambiya Khatun.

... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, Ms. Parna Roy Choudhury.

.........for the Alleged contemnor.

Mr. Hiranmoy Datta.

.......for the respondent.

Heard learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and the alleged contemnor.

Learned advocate representing the alleged contemnor produces the documents being order dated 21st November, 2023, passed by the authority concerned and on perusal of which I find that the order of this Court dated 28th June, 2021, alleged to be violated has already been complied with and a copy of such order passed in compliance of the order of this Court be kept with the record. Learned advocate for the alleged contemnor undertakes to file the said orer in the form of affidavit in course of this day. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that since the order

of this Court alleged to have been violated, has already been complied with, this contempt proceeding is dropped with a caution to the authority to not to take the order of this Court very casually and not to repeat such type of mistake. It is clarified that if at all petitioner is not satisfied with the order of the authority in compliance of the order of this Court that may give rise to a fresh cause of action, but contempt proceeding no more survives.

Accordingly, this contempt application being WPCRC 191 of 2023 is disposed of.

( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)