Raj Klumar Pandey v. State Of West Bengal

04.09.2020.

sp (Rejected) C.R.M. 6269 of 2020 With C.R.A.N.1 of 2020 (Old CRAN 4784 of 2020) (Via Video Conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kalna P.S. Case No.963/2019 dated 07.12.2019 under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.

In the matter of : Raj Kumar Pandey ......petitioner Ms. Rajnandani Das.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Negaive Ahmed, Ms. Sayanti Santra.

..for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference.

Accordingly, the application, being CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CRAN 4784 of 2020), is disposed of.

Having considered the materials on record disclosing prima facie involvement of the petitioners in the alleged crime, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Suvra Ghosh.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)