Smt Subhra Ganguly v. Uttam Ganguly

AD. 22.

July 28, 2021.

MNS.

C. O. No. 1128 of 2021 (Via video conference) Smt. Subhra Ganguly Vs.

Sri Uttam Ganguly Mr. Neil Basu ... for the petitioner.

In view of the innocuous nature of the order proposed to be passed, no prior service of notice on the opposite party is deemed necessary.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has made out a sufficient case as to the suit being delayed inordinately at the hearing stage.

Moreover, considering the implicit urgency involved in any matrimonial suit, it would be appropriate that the suit is disposed of at an early date.

Accordingly, C. O. No. 1128 of 2021 is disposed of by requesting the Additional District Judge, Kalyani, District- Nadia, to dispose of Matrimonial Suit No. 118 of 2017, pending in the said court, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of

the parties, positively within six months from the date of communication of this order to the court below.

The petitioner shall communicate this order, along with a server copy of this order, to the court below, as well as to the opposite party and/or the learned advocate appearing for the opposite party in the court below, at the earliest. The trial court as well as the opposite party shall act on the written communication of the learned advocate for the petitioner, accompanied by a server copy of this order, without insisting upon prior production of a certified copy thereof. There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)