Sunil Kumar Hatua v. Mrinal Kanti Naskar

26.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1036 of 2000 In WPA 21373 of 1998 Sunil Kumar Hatua Vs.

Mrinal Kanti Naskar ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)