← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/3659/2021allowed

Pratima Majumder And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2021-11-24Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

C.R.M. 3659 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) (AD) 24.11.2021 Court No.29 (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 28.04.2021 in connection with Chinsurah P.S. Case No. 41 of 2021 (GR No.184 of 2021) dated 20/01/2021 under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Pratima Majumder & Anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay Mr. Rabi Sankar Chattopadhyay Ms. Payel Shome ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Ld. APP Ms. Sujata Das Ms. Debjani Sahu ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the suicide note and the contents in the case diary.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the offence and considering the fact that the police filed charge sheet, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that they shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on the dates fixed for trial and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date. The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 3659 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)