Sekh Mustafa Ali v. Aktar Hossen Dayan

Sl.26 30.04.2025 Court No.6 BP C.O. 1444 of 2025 Sekh Mustafa Ali -versusAktar Hossen Dayan Mr. Ziaul Haque Mr. Himadri Kumar Mahata ..for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the father praying for a direction upon the learned District Judge, Paschim Medinipur to dispose of the Act VIII Case No.10 of 2023 expeditiously.

In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to issue notice upon the opposite parties.

However, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocates representing them before the learned trial judge. From the order-sheets appended to the revisional application this Court finds that the learned District Judge by an order dated 7th February, 2025 gave liberty to the opposite party to file written objection to the application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act.

The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the written objection was not filed on 17th March, 2025 and on the prayer of the opposite party the hearing of the application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act has been adjourned to May 3, 2025.

In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, C.O. 1444 of 2025 is disposed of by requesting the learned District Judge, Paschim Medinipur to take up the hearing of the application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act on the next date fixed, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing and to make an endeavour to see that the same is disposed of as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

No order as to costs.

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)