Jewel Datta v. Union Of India

7th December, (AK) W.P.A. 7020 of 2020 IA No: CAN 1 of 2020 Jewel Datta Vs.

Union of India and others Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhury ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Avinash Kankani ...for the Union of India.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a receipt of service of notice which is kept on record.

2.

It is submitted that the writ petition was preferred against an order of disqualifying the petitioner as Director of companies till October 31, 2023.

3.

In view of expiry of such period, the concerned Director's Identification Number (DIN) is due to be reactivated subject to other conditions being fulfilled by the petitioner.

4.

Hence, it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the writ petition has become infructuous.

5.

In view of the above submission, WPA 7020 of 2020 along with CAN 1 of 2020 are disposed of as infructuous without any order as to costs.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)