Bapi Nayek v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction 18-04-2024 Subha Item no.119 Ct no.34 CRR 1512 of 2024 Bapi Nayek.

-versus- The State of West Bengal and anr.

Mr. Soumik Ganguli Mr. Sourat Nandy Mr. Supriyo Sashmal Ms. Chandana Chakraborty Mr. D. Bandhu ....for the petitioner.

Petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Magistrate as well as that of the revisional court in Criminal Revision No. 105 of 2024.

The main grievance of the petitioner is that without accepting or perusing the affidavit of assets or liabilities the learned Magistrate disposed of the application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by way of ex parte order thereby awarding maintenance of Rs.6000/- per month.

Being aggrieved the same was challenged before the learned Sessions Judge, Paschim Medinipur. However, the learned Sessions Judge, Paschim Medinipore only gave relief by way of an interim order directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.4000/- per month.

Having considered that the revisional application being the criminal revisional No. 105 of 2024 is still pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Paschim Mednipore, I direct the learned Sessions Judge, Paschim Medinipore to dispose of the revisional

application within a period of sixty days from the appearance of the opposite party wife.

No unnecessary adjournment should be granted to either of the parties.

All efforts be taken to dispose of the revisional application at the earliest. .

With the aforesaid observations, the present revisional application being CRR 1512 of 2024 is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, are consequently disposed of. All concerned parties are to act in terms of a copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. [Tirthankar Ghosh, J]