Calcutta High CourtCPAN/921/2003dismissed for default

Sk. Noor Ahmed v. P. Majumder

2022-09-29Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

29-09-2022 Item no.17 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.921 of 2003 Shaikh Noor Ahmed -vsP. Mazumder arising out of WPA No.7889 of 2003 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on June 17, 2003, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated May 22, 2003 passed by this court in WP No.7889(W) of 2003.

While filing of this application, the petitioner was aged about 64 years. Now, if he is alive, he is 83 years old. It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]