Bapi Saha & ORS. v. Nibhu Guha

Item 21.04.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

No.

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Ct CO 1178 of 2017 rup Bapi Saha & Ors.

Vs Nibhu Guha Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Ms. Paulami Chakraborty, Mr. Samrat Chakraborty, Mr. Saikat Gayen ... for the opposite party.

1. In the order dated 10th March, 2025, learned counsel were shown as appearing on behalf of the petitioners instead of respondent.

2. Necessary correction be made by replacing respondent with the term petitioners.

3. Department is directed to make necessary correction.

4. Remaining portion of the order dated 10.03.2025 shall remain unchanged.

5. This order may be treated as a part of the order dated 10.03.2025.

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party is present.

7. None appears on behalf of the petitioners on call.

8. The instant revisional application is pending since

2017.

9. It appears that petitioners are not at all willing to proceed with this revisional application further. 10.Thus, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.

11.Interim order, if there be any, stands vacated. 12.Department is directed to communicate this order to the learned Trail Court.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)