← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/260/2025rejected

Ali Mohammod Abu Said @ Ali Md. Abu Sayeed @ Kochi v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-05-05Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

May 05, 2025 18 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (M) 260 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Raghunathganj Police Station Case No. 777 of 2024 dated 28/6/2024 under Sections 376/417 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re :

Ali Mohammod Abu Said @ Ali Md. Abu Sayeed @ Kochi ... Petitioner.

Adv. S. Datta, Adv. Asif Dewan, ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Debanik Das, ...for the defacto complainat.

Adv. Ashok Das, ... for the State.

Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

The petitioner is in custody for 110 days and prays for bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was a love relationship between the petitioner and the defacto complainant and the complaint has been lodged after the petitioner got married. Learned counsel for the defacto complainant and the State oppose the prayer.

Learned counsel for the defacto complainant submits that the petitioner has been threatening the victim with dire consequences through the local police station and creating pressure upon her to withdraw the complaint.

Considering the gravity of the offence as well as the chances of the petitioner influencing the witnesses as well as intimidating the victim if released on bail at this stage, the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)