Anisur Rahaman v. State Of West Bengal

CRM 3746 of 2021 18.08.2021 court no.

: 28 Item no.

: PB-01 matter : 439 status : DNP transcriber : nandy In Re: An application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.05.2021 in connection with Panskura Police Station Case No. 495 of 2019 dated NIL under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act (G.R. Case No. 2155 of 2019). and In the matter of: Anisur Rahaman ...... Petitioner Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Abu Sohel, Advocate ......for the Petitioner Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Senior Government Advocate Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Advocate Mr. Suman De, Advocate ...... for the State Mr. Sudipto Moitra, Senior Advocate Mr. Saurav Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Rajdeep Majumdar, Advocate Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharya, Advocate ......

for the victim The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that his client does not intend to press the instant application for bail. The written instruction submitted by the mother of the petitioner in this regard filed in Court today is taken on record. In view of the submission that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the instant application, CRM 3746 of 2021 is dismissed as 'not pressed'.

All the interlocutory orders passed in the instant application stands automatically recalled.

However, the facility of virtual hearing should be provided

to the petitioner wherever he would be shifted for treatment. (Harish Tandon, J.) (Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)