← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (NDPS)/668/2024allowed

Sunil Kumar Basak v. State Of West Bengal

2024-04-18Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth2 pages

18.04.2024.

15.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (NDPS) 668 of 2024 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with NDPS Case No.01 of 2022 arising out of Dalkhola P.S. Case No.12 of 2022 dated 08.01.2022 under Section 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. In the matter of : Sunil Kumar Basak.

.... Petitioner.

Mr. Sudip Guha, Mr. Pronojit Roy.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Saryati Dutta, Ms. Puja Goswami.

...for the State.

1.

Petitioner is in custody for two years and three months. He submits there is delay in trial. Accordingly, he prays for bail.

2.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the bail prayer. He submits two out of eleven witnesses have been examined. 3.

We have considered the materials on record. Though 100 bottles of phensedyl syrup containing codeine phosphate were recovered from a vehicle and the petitioner was in the said vehicle, we note petitioner is in custody for more than two years. Only two out of eleven witnesses have been examined. Delay is not attributed to the defence. There is little possibility of trial concluding in the near future.

4.

Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion petitioner has been able to make out a case for bail on the ground of delay in trial. Bail prayer on the ground of delay in Signed By : ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of April 2024 06:36:06 PM

trial is not fettered by restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act as held in Rabi Prakash Vs. State of Odisha1 5.

Hence, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Sunil Kumar Basak shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the N.D.P.S. Act, Raiganj, Uttar Dinajpur subject to condition that he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever or commit similar offences in future.

7. In the event petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without any justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

8.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Gaurang Kanth,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) 1 2023 SCC OnLine 1109 Signed By : ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of April 2024 06:36:06 PM