Shah Istarul Haque v. State

C.R.R. 1277 of 2006 In re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

And In the matter of: Shah Istarul Haque ...for the petitioner.

20.09.2024 SL. 83 Court No. 551 Suvayan Mr. Saibal Krishna Dasgupta ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Avishek Sinha ...for the State.

1. On behalf of the revisionist an accommodation has been prayed for.

2. Prayer for accommodation is considered and allowed.

3. Let the matter be listed in the Monthly List of December, 2024.

4. It is reported by the A.C.O. that he has not received the L.C.R.s as well as the first appellate court record from the department.

5. It reveals that there is an endorsement dated 03.08.2006 that trial court records in four files from the office of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bankura and appellate court record from the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Bankura have been received.

6. Such being the position, department is directed to search out the trial court record as well as the first appellate court record and to tag the same with the file of the instant revisional application.

7. In the event, for some reason or other the trial court record as well as the first appellate court record have been sent back, department is directed to recall the said records once again

and to tag the same with the instant file positively before the adjourned date.

8. In the event, the trial court records have been sent back and are required to be recalled in that event the department shall notify the same to the learned Advocate-on-Record for the revisionist who on receipt of such notice shall pay/deposit the special messenger cost for bringing the aforementioned records.

9. Since the two interim applications being CRAN 1 of 2024 and CRAN 2 of 2024 have been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 02.08.2024 department is directed not to show pendency of the said two applications during the next listing of this case.

(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)