← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/9598/2023dismissed

Sudeshna Ghosh Sarkar And ANR v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2024-06-19Hon'Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak2 pages

15.01.2026 Sl. No.7 Ct. No.14 gd

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA/9598/2023 SUDESHNA GHOSH SARKAR AND ANR.

VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

IA NO: CAN/1/2024, CAN/2/2024 Mr. Kamalesh Bhattacharya Mr. Aninda Bhattacharya ...for the Petitioners.

Mr. Somraj Dhar ...for the State.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Baid ...for the Respondent Nos.6 and 7.

Re: CAN 1 of 2024 and CAN 2 of 2024 1.

Both the applications are for restoration by recalling order dated 19th June, 2024.

2.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Baid, learned advocate appearing for respondent nos.6 and 7 submits that the petitioners have suppressed material facts in the applications. Two applications have been filed for restoration. Repeated notices were given to the petitioners by the school authority intimating the date of the proceedings. However, no steps were taken which led to dismissal of the writ petition. He seeks to file affidavit-in-opposition. 3.

Let such affidavit-in-opposition be filed within two weeks from date. Advance copy of the affidavit-in-

opposition be served upon the learned advocate for the applicants. Reply thereto may be filed within one week thereafter.

4.

List this matter after three weeks under the same heading.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)