← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1276/2026rejected

Rabbul @ Robbul v. State Of West Bengal

2026-05-14Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta1 pages

14.05.2026 Court No.28 Item No.28 tbsr Reject CRM (A) 1276 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Ratua P.S. Case No.880 of 2025 dated 02.12.2025 under Sections 123/329(3) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of: Rabbul @ Robbul ....Petitioner.

Mr. Kalidas Saha Ms. Khushi Mollick Mr. Pikesh Kr. Chauhan ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya ....Amicus.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned Amicus assisting the State relies on the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the statement of the alleged victim and the statements of other witnesses as well as the injury report, which shows that it was a case of poisoning. The prosecution case is that the petitioner allegedly tried to poison the victim to death.

Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)