Anil Kumar Venaik v. State Of West Bengal & ANR

Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present :

The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri C.R.R. 1187 of 2017 Anil Kumar Venaik Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

For the petitioner : Mr. Karan Dudhwewala, Adv. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Somopriyo Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Dipayan Dan, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Binay Kumar Panda, Adv.

Mr. Subham Kanti Bhakat, Adv.

Heard on : 16.03.2023 Judgment On : 16.03.2023.

Bibek Chaudhuri, J.

It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the opposite party producing a photostat copy of death report that the private opposite party has died. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the State also submits a report regarding the death of the opposite party No.2.

The instant criminal revision has been preferred against a criminal proceeding wherein the opposite party No.2 was arrayed as

an accused. As the accused has passed away, the instant criminal revision becomes infructuous.

Thus, the criminal revision is disposed of as infructuous. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

The photostat copy of the death certificate of the opposite party No.2 and the report submitted by the Inspector-in-Charge, Bidhannagar East Police Station be kept with the record. (Bibek Chaudhuri, J.) Mithun De/ A.R. (Ct).

Sl No.01.

D/L.