Golam Murtoza @ Golam Mortuja @ Golam Murtaza v. State Of West Bengal

22.06.2026 Court No.35.

D/L.59.

Rakib (Allowed) CRM (NDPS) 862 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, in connection with Harischandrapur Police Station case no. 1368 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025 under Sections 21(c)/25/27(a)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Golam Murtoza @ Golam Mortuja @ Golam Murtaza.

......Petitioner.

Mr. Rana Mukherjee .....for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, Ld. APP Mr. Ramashis Mukherjee ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 6 months, charge-sheet has already been submitted and the total recovery in the present case relate to alleged recovery of 119 bottles of phensedyl. The prosecution has relied upon 18 witnesses to prove its case which will consume substantial period of time, as such the petitioner prays for bail on any stringent conditions.

Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail but accepts the contention that the subject matter of the case relate to 119 bottles of phensedyl being recovered. I have taken onto account the period of detention of the present petitioner and the time which would be consumed for taking the trial to its logical conclusion, having considered the same, I am

inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly,, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

As such, the petitioner, namely, Golam Murtoza @ Golam Mortuja @ Golam Murtaza shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court (under NDPS Act), 4th Court, Malda. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Malda without prior permission of the learned Special Court.

Thus, CRM (NDPS) No. 862 of 2026 is allowed.

Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)