Calcutta High CourtCPAN/950/2003dismissed for default

Dipankar Baidya v. Suprovat Som

2022-08-29Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

29.08.2022.

C.P.A.N. 950 of 2003 Dipankar Baidya Vs. Suprovat Som In WPA 3465 of 2002 Dipankar Baidya Vs. The State ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)