Kajiruddin Ahammed @ Talo v. State Of West Bengal

AD 39 May 6, 2025 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 1486 of 2025 Allowed An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Itahar P.S. Case No.188 of 2025 dated 13.03.2025 under Sections 126(2)/118(1)/117(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of:

Kajiruddin Ahammed @ Talo ... petitioner Mr. Anindya Ghosh Mr. Pronojit Roy ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Kunal Ganguly ... for the State Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are case and counter-case over the same incident. A scuffle had broken out between two groups of people. No grievous injury was inflicted on anyone. The petitioner is partially paralysed.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the statements of witnesses, including the injured. It does not appear that grievous injury was inflicted on the victim.

In view of the materials available in the case diary and the fact that there are case and counter-case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each, one of

whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on the further conditions that the petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once a fortnight till submission of report in final form and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Jay Sengupta, J.)