Abdul Rahim v. C.E.S.C. Limited

26.08.2021 Item no.39 Aloke Through Video Conference Ct. no.8 W.P.A. 9304 of 2005 Abdul Rahim

Versus

CESC Limited & Anr.

Mr. Madhusudan Saharay, Advocate ... for the CESC None appears for the petitioner.

Learned Advocate appearing for the CESC submits that the disconnection was due to theft.

The petitioner deposited 50% of the amount claimed. Since the petitioner is not represented, W.P.A. 9304 of 2005 is dismissed for default.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)