Midland Nursing Home Pvt Ltd And ANR v. The Inspector In Charge, Belgharia P.S. And ORS

jks 27.11.2025 CRR 1371 of 2021 Midland Nursing Home Private Limited & Anr.

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Manjit Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kaushik Chatterjee Mr. Biswajit Mal Mr. Soham Sen ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Supreem Naskar Ms. Jayashree Patra ... ... for the Opposite Party No.2 Ms. Amita Gour Mr. Nirupam Dhali ... ... for the State

1. The Report filed today by the learned advocate for the State is taken on record.

2. The said Report discloses that in the predicate case, Belghoria Police Station Case No. 324/20 dated 12th July, 2020, registered under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.), the Investigating Officer (I.O.) submitted a Final Report True (FRT) vide No. 233/24 dated 30th June, 2024.

3. A more crucial development is recorded in the Report: the 'Narazi Petition' preferred by the Opposite Party No. 2, praying for a direction for further investigation or taking cognizance, was rejected by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, on 25th August, 2025. Consequently, the jurisdictional criminal case stands disposed of.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, given the decisive rejection of the 'Narazi Petition' by the Trial Court and the resultant disposal of the original criminal proceeding, the subject matter of this Revisional Application has been entirely extinguished. It is, therefore, contended that the instant application has been rendered infructuous and ought to be disposed of forthwith.

5. Learned advocate for the Opposite Party No. 2 does not object to this contention.

6. This Court finds merit in the submission. The very foundation for this revisional challenge has been superseded by the subsequent final orders of the Magistrate's Court, which has conclusively dealt with the police report and the de facto complainant's challenge thereto.

There remains no surviving grievance capable of effective redressal by this Court under its revisional jurisdiction.

7. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revisional Application is disposed of as having become infructuous.

8. There shall be no order as to costs.

9. The connected application, if any, stands disposed of.

10. Interim order, if any, granted earlier in this proceeding, stands vacated.

11. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Uday Kumar, J.)