R.M.Upadhyay v. Anil Baijal

08.08.2022.

C.P.A.N. 806 of 2004 In WPA 2288 of 2001 R. M. Upadhyay Vs.

Anil Baijal ab Ct. 40 Mr. Shailendra Mishra ... For the Union of India.

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)