Muktarani Mahato v. B.D.O., Purulia

AD. 15.

March 4, 2022.

MNS.

(Through Video Conference) WPA No. 8237 of 2007 Smt. Muktarani Mahato Vs.

Block Development Officer and others None appears for the writ petitioner at the time of call. No accommodation has been prayed for either.

Record reveals that the writ petitioner is not interested to move the writ petition. The petitioner was also not represented on March 3, 2022.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for default.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)