Dilip Mukherjee v. Manas Ranjan Chatterjee And ORS

AD. 93.

June 30, 2021.

MNS.

C. O. No. 1222 of 2021 (Via video conference) Dilip Mukherjee Vs.

Mr. Manas Ranjan Chatterjee and others Mr. Maria Rahaman ... for the petitioner.

In view of the innocuous nature of the order proposed to be passed, no prior service of notice on the opposite parties is deemed necessary.

C. O. No. 1222 of 2021 is disposed of, in view of the inordinate delay in disposal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the trial court, by requesting the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Third Court at Barasat, District- North 24 Parganas, to dispose of the said application filed by the defendant no. 1-petitioner in the said court in connection with Title Suit No. 676 of 2019, as expeditiously as possible, positively within two months from the date of communication of this order to the court below.

The learned advocate for the petitioner shall communicate this order along with a server copy thereof to the opposite parties and/or the learned advocate(s) appearing for the opposite parties in the court below as well as to the court below to ensure due compliance of the same.

The parties as well as the trial court shall act on such written communication without insisting upon prior production of a certified copy of this order.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)