Shahin Parveen @ Guria Bibi v. State Of West Bengal

22.05.2025 Court No.28 Item No.14 ssi CRM (A) 1547 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Belur GRPS Case No.04 of 2025 dated 09.04.2025 under Sections 305( C) of the BNS 2023.

And In the matter of: Shahin Parveen @ Guria Bibi ....Applicant/Petitioner.

Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra Mr. Husen Mustafi ...for the petitioner Ms. Faria Hossain, Ld. APP Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee ..for the State It appears from the statement of the de facto complainant that her mother was travelling with others in a train. The present accused was allegedly standing behind her. After some time, they found that a gold chain was missing. However, from CCTV footage of a nearby place, the petitioner could be identified as a suspect by the de facto complainant.

Therefore, there is no eye-witness account about who actually committed the theft.

Considering the nature of allegations and the materials available in the case diary, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses and shall cooperate with investigation. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Jay Sengupta, J.)