Situ Momin v. Tayefa Khatun & ANR

34.

20-12-2021 (ct. no.29) debajyoti CRR 1655 of 2011 In re: An application under Sections 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

- A n d - In the matter of : Situ Momin .... Petitioner.

Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala, Mr. Pratick Bose ... For the State.

Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala, learned advocate, and Mr. Pratick Bose, learned advocate, who usually appear on behalf of the State, are present in Court. They are requested to appear on behalf of the State in this matter. Their appointment may be regularized by the learned Public Prosecutor of this Court.

Learned lawyer on behalf of the State appears and submits that none is appearing in this revisional application on behalf of the petitioner and copy was also not served upon the other side.

I have gone through the judgment and I do not find any illegality in the order impugned. Considering all facts and circumstances discussed above, I find no reason to continue with this revisional application and as a result, the revisional application stands dismissed.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all necessary formalities.

( Bibhas Ranjan De, J. )