← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1410/2024dismissed as rejected

Maqsood Raza v. State Of West Bengal

2024-04-23Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

23.04.2024 Item No.18 Ct. No. 29 CHC Rejected C.R.M.(A) 1410 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Howrah Police Station Case No. 27/24 dated 25.01.2024 under Sections 147/ 148/ 149/ 153A/ 186/ 332/ 333/ 353/ 307/ 427/506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 9/15C of the West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order Act and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act. And In the matter of : Maqsood Raza ...... petitioner Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashok Das, Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Ms. Hasi Jana ....for the petitioner Mr. Tanmoy Kr. Ghosh, Mr. Sourat Nandy ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, petitioner is a Secretary of a religious organization. Petitioner was present in a procession. Petitioner did not partake in the violence that ensued.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the Case Diary. He submits that, police personnel were injured. Public properties were vandalized. Eyewitnesses as also injured places the petitioner at the place and time of occurrence and attributes Signed By :

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY High Court of Calcutta 23 rd of April 2024 05:59:20 PM

active role to the petitioner in the incident of assault and destruction of public property amongst others. Materials in the Case Diary suggest that, petitioner was present at the place and time of occurrence and played active role in the incident.

Police personnel suffered injuries. Public properties were destroyed.

The incident occurred due to communal tension. A religious procession resulted in the incident. Enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail will send wrong signal to the society.

In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. CRM(A) 1410 of 2024 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)