Priyanshu Pandey v. State Of West Bengal

09.06.2022 tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. (A) 2492 of 2022 sl no. 124 In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Lake Town P.S case no. 105 of 2022 dated 10.5.2022 under sections 448/427/506/380/34 of the IPC And Allowed In Re : Priyanshu Pandey ...... petitioner Mr. M M Verma Ms P Verma Mr. A verma ...... for the petitioner Ms. Z N Khan das Mr. Ashok Das ...... for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the dispute arose out of a matrimonial quarrel.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having considered materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of allegations and as the allegation of theft requires to be assessed in the light of the submission relating to the dispute between an estrange couple, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Petitioner shall appear before the court below and prays for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application being CRM (A) 2492 of 2022 is disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)