← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/1863/2022disposed

Sima Ghosh v. Ashim Bose

2023-01-05Hon'Ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri3 pages

Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present :

The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri CRR 1863 of 2022 Sima Ghosh Vs.

Ashim Bose Ms. Sima Ghosh

...Petitioner (in person)

Mr. Sayak Majumder ..for the opposite party Item No. 49.

Heard & Judgment on:

05.01.2023 Bibek Chaudhuri, J.

This is an application assailing an order dated 19th March, 2022 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, North 24 Parganas at Barasat in Misc. Execution Case No.71 of 2010 arising out of Maintenance Case No.48 of 2009 under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

It is submitted by the petitioner in person that the said execution case was dismissed for default. Huge amount of arrear maintenance is lying due. Until and unless the said execution is restored, the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the opposite party/husband, on the other hand, that in connection with Misc. Execution Case No.71 of 2010 the opposite party has complied with the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 161-162 of 2015 (SLP) (CRL) No.8083/8084 of 2014 and the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Review Petition (CRL Nos. 327-328/2015 in CRLA Nos. 161-162 of 2015.

Thus, it is obvious from the submission made by the learned advocate for the opposite party/husband that the opposite party even did not care to comply with the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order in toto. Accordingly, Misc. Execution Case No.71 of 2010 is restored to its file.

The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Barasat is directed to adjudicate and decide as to whether any arrear payment in terms of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is long due or not. If it is found that any part of the amount is lying

due, the opposite party shall be directed to pay the entire amount due in one trance within one month from the date of communication of this order, failing which coercive step shall be taken against the petitioner.

The instant revision is, thus, disposed of.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)