← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/1273/2024rejected

Paltu Sk. v. State Of West Bengal

2024-05-01Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth2 pages

01.05.2024.

35.

Ct.No.28 as (Rejected) C.R.M. (DB) 1273 of 2024 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection Bharatpur P.S. Case No.352 of dated 24.10.2022 under Sections 392/302/328/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Paltu Sk.

... Petitioner.

Ms. Nandita Bakshi.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. A.P.P., Mr. Saptarshi Chakraborty.

...for the State.

1.

Petitioner is in custody for 546 days. He submits defacto complainant had turned hostile. Accordingly, he prays for bail.

2.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the bail prayer. He submits trial is at its fag end. All prosecution witnesses except investigating officer have been examined. 3.

We have considered the materials on record. Offences, if proved, would attract mandatory life imprisonment. Trial is at its fag end.

4.

Under such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

Signed By :

ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 3 rd of May 2024 05:52:31 PM

6.

We request the trial court to conclude the trial at an early date preferably within three months from the next date fixed for recording evidence without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

7.

Parties shall co-operate with the trial court and communicate this order for due compliance.

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 3 rd of May 2024 05:52:31 PM