← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (NDPS)/908/2023allowed

Ayub Sk v. State Of West Bengal

2023-05-02Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

02.05.2023 Sl. No.12 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (NDPS) 908 of 2023 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 25.04.2023 in connection with Hogolberia Police Station Case No.17 of 2023 dated 24.01.2023 under Sections 20(b)/22/29 of the NDPS Act and Section 14(A) of the Foreigners Act. (NDPS Case No.5 of 2023) And In Re: Ayub Sk.

... ... Petitioner Mrs. Karabi Roy ... ... for the petitioner Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta ... ... for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in custody for over 50 days. It is further submitted no narcotics was recovered from his possession. Co-accused have been enlarged on bail. Accordingly, he prays for bail.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. We have considered the materials on record. We find that no narcotic substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and his complicity has transpired from the statement of co-accused before a police officer which is inadmissible in evidence. Co-accused have been enlarged on bail. Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion petitioner has been able to rebut the statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. In view of the aforesaid fact and period of detention suffered by the petitioner, we are of the opinion further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary. Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Ayub Sk., be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom

must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court, under the NDPS Act, Nadia at Krishnagar subject to condition that the said petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever or commit similar offences in future.

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without any justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. The application for bail, thus, stands allowed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)