Aminul Islam v. State Of West Bengal

24.06.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.90 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.

Allowed C.R.M. (NDPS) 970 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Itahar Police Station Case No. 207 of 2026 dated 09.03.2026 under Sections 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

And In Re :

Aminul Islam ... Petitioner.

Mr. Kaushik Choudhury, Mr. Tridib Das ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, APP, Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw ... For the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that although the subject-matter of recovery in the present case is 2020 grams of Brown Sugar, but there has been no recovery from the present petitioner and the petitioner has been implicated in connection with the instant case on the basis of statement of co-accused. Petitioner is in custody for 100 days and charge-sheet has already been submitted. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail, but is unable to refute the contentions of the petitioner that there has been no recovery from the present petitioner and he has been implicated on the basis of statement of the co-accused.

On a query from this Court, learned advocate for the State replies that there are no criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. Having considered the same and the

period of detention of the present petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Aminul Islam shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the NDPS Act, 1st Court, Raiganj, Uttar Dinajpur. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of Uttar Dinajpur without prior permission of the learned Special Court.

The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 970 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of.

Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)