← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (NDPS)/969/2026allowed

Mijanur Rahaman v. State Of West Bengal

2026-06-24Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

24.06.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.89 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.

Allowed C.R.M. (NDPS) 969 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 1401 of 2025 dated 10.08.2025 under Sections 21(c)/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In Re :

Mijanur Rahaman ... Petitioner.

Mr. Amitabha Karmakar, Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP ... For the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner is better placed than the other accused persons who have been granted bail on 26.02.2026 in CRM(NDPS) 277 of 2026. Petitioner is in custody for 100 days, charge-sheet has been submitted and there has been no recovery from the present petitioner. Petitioner has been implicated in the instant case on the basis of statement of the co-accused.

Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there are criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. I have taken into account the fact that in the other case i.e. in CRM(NDPS) 755 of 2026, the present petitioner was detained and shown arrested in this case and subsequently granted bail in CRM(NDPS) 755 of 2026. Having considered that there has been no recovery from the

present petitioner, I am of the opinion that the present petitioner viz., Mijanur Rahaman be released on bail by the learned Trial Court on the same terms and conditions as the other accused persons viz. Md. Salam Sk. and Nakim Sk. who have been granted bail in CRM (NDPS) 277 of 2026. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 969 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of.

Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)