Rahup Ali Sekh v. Punam Jana Manna

22.12.2025 C.P.A.N. 806 of 2025 (CAN 1 OF 2025) kaushik in WPA 7898 of 2024 Rahup Ali Sekh Vs.

Smt. Punam Jana (Manna) Mr. Anil Kumar Chattopadhyay ... for the applicant.

Mr. Saptak Sanyal ... for the alleged contemnor.

This is an application alleging violation of an order dated 19th December, 2024.

None appears on behalf of State nor is any adjournment prayed for on their behalf.

Mr. Saptak Sanyal, Advocate, who usually appears on behalf of State is present in Court and is directed to represent the alleged contemnor.

The appointment of Mr. Sanyal be regularized by the Legal Remembrancer. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this application for contempt on Mr. Sanyal during the course of day.

List this matter in the Monthly List of January, 2026.

Mr. Sanyal is directed to take necessary instructions in the meantime.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)