← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (NDPS)/992/2026dismissed

Sijarul Sk v. State Of West Bengal

2026-06-24Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

26.06.2026 Sl. No. 111 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(NDPS) 992 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 880 of 2025 dated 10.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

-AndIn the matter of: Sijarul Sk.

...Petitioner

Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Golam Ahammed ...for the Petitioner Mr. Gauranga Kumar Das, Ld. APP Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya.

...for the State

1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in the instant case for the alleged recovery of 260 grams of heroin and is in custody for eight months. Prosecution intends to examine seventeen (17) witnesses and till date, charges have not been framed.

2. Mr. Gauranga Kumar Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, along with Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya, learned Advocate was directed to represent the State in the present case. Their appearance may be regularized.

3. Learned advocate for the State submits that the recovery is of commercial quantity. Chemical examiner's report does support the defence case.

4. Having considered that the quantum of seizure in the present case is of commercial quantity, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage.

5. Petitioner would renew the prayer for bail after evidence of seizure list witnesses are over. Learned Trial Court would expedite the process of consideration of charges and within a period of 60 days from the date of framing of charge shall complete the examination of seizure-list witnesses.

6. At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

7. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 992 of 2026 is dismissed.

8. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)